Search www.theindiankanoon.com:
-->

OKHLA ENCLAVE PLOT HOLDERS WEL. ASON. Vs. U O I & ORS-17 July 2013-Supreme Court Judgment

                                                              Non-reportable
                        IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                            ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

                           I.A. Nos. 8 & 9 of 2008

                                     In

                      WRIT PETITION (C) No. 876 of 1996

Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Assn.        .. Petitioner(s)

                                   Versus

Union of India & Others                           .. Respondent(s)


WITH
I.A. Nos. 1-42 in IA Nos. 8 & 9 in WP (C) No. 876 of 1996
I.A. Nos. 11 & 12 in WP (C) No. 477 of 1996
I.A. No. 10 in WP (C) No. 876 of 1996
I.A. nos. 13-24 in WP (C) No. 876 of 1996


                                  O R D E R

      Heard learned counsel on either sides at length.
      When the matter came up for hearing on 9.7.2013, in order  to  give  a
quietus to the entire dispute, we felt it appropriate that all  the  parties
and their counsel meet  together  and  file  a  Consensus  Memo/Common  Note
latest by 11.7.2013.
      Following the said order, an undated Memo  of  Submissions  signed  by
Shri Piyush Sharma (for Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association)  and
Shri  P.  Narasimhan  (for  Durga  Builder  Plot  Holder  Association)   was
submitted on 9.7.2013, jointly praying for the following directions:
1.    DGT&CP Haryana be directed to take over the  available  licensed  area
      as indicated in his  affidavit  and  retain  it  in  his  custody  to
      facilitate the process of allotment till further orders.  He shall be
      responsible for watch and ward, care and custody of this property and
      will be its custodian till the dispute is resolved.

2.    DGTPC Haryana may be directed to take steps thereafter to  finalize  a
      final list  of  claimants  taking  in  regard  the  exercise  already
      undertaken by him, pursuant to this Court's direction dated 22.4.2013
      the identification/determination of  2196  entitlements  by  the  Ld.
      Court Commissioner, besides 844 persons by DGTCP under the  Order  of
      Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court for inclusion in the  entitlement
      list.  While doing so he  (DGT&CP)  be  required  to  scrutinize  the
      already prepared list of claimants to remove duplication  if  any  in
      Commissioner's report and his own list and then proceed to prepare  a
      final list of claimants based on the available record for  submission
      to the Court.

3.    As regards  left  out  532  members  of  Durga  Plot  Holders  Welfare
      Association (IA 11 & 12), whose claim was not considered or  rejected
      by the Director Town & Country Planning but whose appeal/writ against
      this is pending in  the  Punjab  &  Haryana  High  Court  in  WP  (C)
      368/2005, it may be directed  that  they  would  withdraw  that  Writ
      Petition from  the  Punjab  &  Haryana  High  Court  subject  to  the
      condition that Director General would  consider  their  claim  afresh
      after allowing them to furnish proof in support and pass  appropriate
      orders uninfluenced  by  his  earlier  decision.   Whoever  is  found
      entitled from amongst those shall be enlisted in the final  list.   A
      similar exercise shall be undertaken by him in respect of  applicants
      in IAs before this Court filed after IAs 8 & 9.

4.    The DGT&CP may also be directed that after going through this  process
      and after looking at the emerging picture if he finds that  available
      plots  (category-wise)  in  two  categories  of  EWS  and  NPNL   are
      sufficient to meet the requirement of finalized  claimants  he  shall
      submit a draft allotment list to the Court.  In  case  he  finds  any
      deficiencies of plots he shall direct the builder  to  make  it  good
      from his "General"  category  area  as  stated  by  his  counsel  Mr.
      Sarbjeet Sharma on his instructions before the Court on 9.7.2013.

5.    The Director General may also be directed to  exercise  his  statutory
      power under the Haryana Development & Regulation of Urban  Areas  Act
      1975 to take  steps  to  ensure  that  internal  development  of  the
      licensed area is completed  within  3  (three)  months  and  also  to
      explore in exercise of such powers to undo any  encroachment  on  766
      plots.

6.    That it may be further directed that any proceedings in any  Court  on
      the subject matter shall stay and remain in  abeyance  to  facilitate
      the resolution of the dispute and that no further  proceedings  shall
      also be entertained by any Court on the subject matter  till  further
      orders from this Court."


      To ascertain as to whether the directions sought for are acceptable to
all the parties, we are inclined to post the matter on  18.7.2013.   Ordered
accordingly.


                                     ……………………………..…J.
                                     (K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN)






                                     ………………………………..J.
                                     (DIPAK MISRA)
New Delhi,
July 17, 2013

No comments :

Post a Comment